Review



alphamelts model  (GEOSYSTEMS GmbH)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    GEOSYSTEMS GmbH alphamelts model
    Alphamelts Model, supplied by GEOSYSTEMS GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/alphamelts+model/alphamelts+model/10__1002_slash_2016gc006594-208-33-6
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    alphamelts model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    other:

    Article Title: Origin of ultra rear-arc magmatism at Rishiri Volcano, Kuril Arc
    Article Snippet: Confidential manuscript submitted to Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems modal abundances of the source mantle of 57 wt.%, 23 wt.%, 16 wt.%, 3 wt.%, and 1 wt.% for olivine, orthopyroxene, clinopyroxene, spinel, and garnet, respectively [AlphaMELTS model; Ghiorso et al., 2002; Smith and Asimow, 2005].



    Similar Products

    alphamelts for matlab fractional crystallisation model  (MathWorks Inc)
    90
    MathWorks Inc alphamelts for matlab fractional crystallisation model
    Comparison of volumetric flux calculations for porous flow ( A ) and channelised melt flow ( B ) demonstrate that channelised melt flow—with channel radii between 10 and 30 cm—can match the volumetric flux of melt through a crystal mush system 1–3 km in radius with a porosity (Φ) between 0.1 and 0.4. Volumetric flux calculations are performed using the equations displayed in the “Methods” section, with phase densities taken from the <t>alphaMELTS</t> for MATLAB fractional crystallisation model at 1180 °C and the mush density calculated using the modal proportions used in scenarios 1 and 2 (ol 5 :plag 55 :cpx 40 ). The viscosity of the melt phase is calculated in the Python3 tool Thermobar using the melt viscosity model of Giordano et al. at 1180 °C and the liquid composition from alphaMELTS for MATLAB.
    Alphamelts For Matlab Fractional Crystallisation Model, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/alphamelts+model/pmc10226991-131-19-21
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    alphamelts for matlab fractional crystallisation model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    alphamelts model  (GEOSYSTEMS GmbH)
    90
    GEOSYSTEMS GmbH alphamelts model
    Comparison of volumetric flux calculations for porous flow ( A ) and channelised melt flow ( B ) demonstrate that channelised melt flow—with channel radii between 10 and 30 cm—can match the volumetric flux of melt through a crystal mush system 1–3 km in radius with a porosity (Φ) between 0.1 and 0.4. Volumetric flux calculations are performed using the equations displayed in the “Methods” section, with phase densities taken from the <t>alphaMELTS</t> for MATLAB fractional crystallisation model at 1180 °C and the mush density calculated using the modal proportions used in scenarios 1 and 2 (ol 5 :plag 55 :cpx 40 ). The viscosity of the melt phase is calculated in the Python3 tool Thermobar using the melt viscosity model of Giordano et al. at 1180 °C and the liquid composition from alphaMELTS for MATLAB.
    Alphamelts Model, supplied by GEOSYSTEMS GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/alphamelts+model/alphamelts+model/10__1002_slash_2016gc006594-208-33-6
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    alphamelts model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Comparison of volumetric flux calculations for porous flow ( A ) and channelised melt flow ( B ) demonstrate that channelised melt flow—with channel radii between 10 and 30 cm—can match the volumetric flux of melt through a crystal mush system 1–3 km in radius with a porosity (Φ) between 0.1 and 0.4. Volumetric flux calculations are performed using the equations displayed in the “Methods” section, with phase densities taken from the alphaMELTS for MATLAB fractional crystallisation model at 1180 °C and the mush density calculated using the modal proportions used in scenarios 1 and 2 (ol 5 :plag 55 :cpx 40 ). The viscosity of the melt phase is calculated in the Python3 tool Thermobar using the melt viscosity model of Giordano et al. at 1180 °C and the liquid composition from alphaMELTS for MATLAB.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Porosity evolution of mafic crystal mush during reactive flow

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38136-x

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of volumetric flux calculations for porous flow ( A ) and channelised melt flow ( B ) demonstrate that channelised melt flow—with channel radii between 10 and 30 cm—can match the volumetric flux of melt through a crystal mush system 1–3 km in radius with a porosity (Φ) between 0.1 and 0.4. Volumetric flux calculations are performed using the equations displayed in the “Methods” section, with phase densities taken from the alphaMELTS for MATLAB fractional crystallisation model at 1180 °C and the mush density calculated using the modal proportions used in scenarios 1 and 2 (ol 5 :plag 55 :cpx 40 ). The viscosity of the melt phase is calculated in the Python3 tool Thermobar using the melt viscosity model of Giordano et al. at 1180 °C and the liquid composition from alphaMELTS for MATLAB.

    Article Snippet: Volumetric flux calculations are performed using the equations displayed in the “Methods” section, with phase densities taken from the alphaMELTS for MATLAB fractional crystallisation model at 1180 °C and the mush density calculated using the modal proportions used in scenarios 1 and 2 (ol :plag 55 :cpx 40 ).

    Techniques: Comparison, Viscosity